Tag: Commentary

  • Fifth freedom flights and Singapore Airlines: What next?

    Fifth freedom flights and Singapore Airlines: What next?

    In recent months, Singapore Airlines and its low-cost subsidiary Scoot made news with some of its more innovative fifth freedom service within Europe.

    Singapore Airlines first announced the resumption of its Rome service, but via Copenhagen as a tag-on service. Shortly after, Scoot announced that its original two European destination – Athens in Greece and Berlin in Germany – will be combined into a single service (Singapore-Athens-Berlin) later this month.

    The move has led many industry observers say that this was a tactic for SIA to tap on the liberalisation of borders and Covid-19 controls within the EU, given that Asia Pacific was still pretty much closed up even as the rest of the world are easing restrictions as vaccination rates are going up.

    Singapore Airlines’ past fifth freedom flights

    As a purely international aircraft with no domestic market to tap on, Singapore Airlines has to think creatively to tap on other revenue markets. While Singapore is geographically advantaged when it comes to serving Asia Pacific as a region, it doesn’t have the same edge when it comes to connecting to some other continents that boast of larger markets, such as the Trans-Atlantic market.

    Unfortunately air services agreement belong squarely in the remit of government-to-government negotiations, and most countries are highly protective of their home carriers for obvious reasons, both economic and geo-political.

    As a country, Singapore is traditionally a big advocate of open skies policies, and often sought to seek the least restrictive rights to operate flights to, from and beyond third countries. It has signed open skies agreement with more than a dozen countries, allowing unlimited air services between Singapore and these countries – as well as beyond – subject to operational constraints.

    Singapore Airlines have in the past famously mounted many of these fifth freedom flights, including:

    • SQ1/2 – Singapore – Hong Kong, China – Los Angeles, USA
    • SQ5/6 – Singapore – Taipei, Taiwan – Los Angeles, USA
    • SQ25/26 – Singapore – Frankfurt, Germany – New York JFK, USA
    • SQ51/52 – Singapore – Manchester, UK – Houston, USA
    • SQ67/68 – Singapore – Barcelona, Italy – Sao Paulo, Brazil

    and many more.

    Singapore Airlines’ fifth freedom flights over the years

    Unfortunately, fifth freedom rights are incredibly difficult to negotiate today owing to sensitivities, and there have been many instances where approvals were not given at the last minute.

    Back in 2016, Singapore Airlines have sought to operate Singapore-Jakarta-Sydney, which was observed by analysts to be an underserved and attractive sector. However, the new service never took off; the launch was postponed indefinitely due to a ‘runway maintenance works’ at Jakarta’s main airport, and eventually canned.

    Origins of fifth freedom services

    Before long-haul jets were widely available, it was commonplace for airlines to make multiple stops along a long-haul route. For instance, right up to the 1970s, the Singapore Airlines service between Singapore and London could make up to five stops along the way, with a total journey time of close to 24 hours!

    Singapore Airlines northbound flight schedule, circa 1970s

    Along the way, SIA was allowed to pick up and/or drop off passengers along the way, almost akin to running a bus service. However, the rights to sell tickets between specific countries must be pre-negotiated and not a given. Where approvals are not given, this is where you see restrictions. For instance, back in the 1970s, SIA had no rights to sell tickets between Rome and Amsterdam, nor between Bombay (Mumbai today) and Bahrain, even though these were stops along the same service.

    For a more in-depth understanding on fifth freedom flights, One Mile at A Time has a very good article you can check out here.

    London-New York service, next?

    There has been talk on several forums speculating what Singapore Airlines might do next to tap on the reopening of quarantine-free travel within the EU, and beyond.

    One such routing speculated was a London Heathrow-New York JFK service, using an A380 aircraft. Singapore Airlines has earlier this week moved one of its A380 out of Alice Springs back to Singapore, and this would be consistent with hearsay plans for SIA to resume A380 service in September.

    Singapore Airlines do not have any published schedules involving the A380 at the moment, but the airline has tentatively planned some routes for the superjumbo from 31 Oct, including services to London, Sydney, Beijing, Auckland, Delhi, and several more.

    With load factors at an all-time low, the A380 seems like an unlikely candidate for any service out of Singapore, but this would allow Singapore Airlines to carry enough passengers from Singapore to London and New York on a single aircraft, with enough room to spare to ferry passengers between the two Transatlantic financial hubs.

    London Heathrow Airport

    Pre-pandemic, this route was one of the most – if not the most – lucrative routes in the world. Nicknamed “the Billion Dollar Route“, London-New York earned British Airways a cool US$1.2 billion between April 2018 and April 2019, the highest for any commercial air service route that year.

    London-New York is also an incredibly competitive route, with only four airlines: British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, Delta and American Airlines plying the route. US’s other major carrier, United Airways, operates a daily service out of its Newark hub to London-Heathrow.

    So why hasn’t any non-UK/non-US airline plied that route?

    Historically, there have been several LHR-JFK services mounted by foreign carriers using fifth freedom rights. These include:

    • Kuwait Airways, terminated in 2016
    • Air India, terminated in 2008
    • Air India (albeit between LHR and EWR, not JFK), but also terminated in 2018
    • Air France, around 2008 under the EU-US Open Skies policy
    • Qantas, some time in the 1970s!

    The list isn’t terribly long but for good reasons.

    Firstly, landing slots at London Heathrow are notoriously difficult to get. With the airport’s slots all but taken up, the only way airlines could get more slots was to buy over from slots from other airlines, sometimes at record-high prices. In 2020, Air New Zealand sold its daily slot pair at London Heathrow for a cool US$27 million, and this was not the highest ever recorded transaction for a pair of slots at LHR.

    To do a fifth freedom tag-on from LHR to JFK (or vice versa), this means that a single service will require two pairs of slots for the service. For most airlines, this is a poor use of slots; two pairs of slots can be better utilised with two daily flights between LHR and their respective home markets, rather than to dip into the LHR-JFK fray.

    However, London-Heathrow, like many airports, have a ‘use it or lose it’ policy when it comes to slots. Traditionally, airlines are required to operate at least 80% of their slots, otherwise they risk losing them in the following year. This policy has been waived since the pandemic hit last year, and have been last extended to cover the 2021 Northern Summer season. This creates a situation where other airlines could, in theory, at least access some of these unused slots temporarily, creating in possibilities of new players at least for a short while.

    Secondly, the rights to sell tickets and carry traffic between LHR and JFK is subject to air services agreement between the carrier’s home country, United Kingdom and United States. If not in place, such negotiations typically take several years to formalise.

    While many nations do have open sky policies with these two nations, the limiting factors may include capacity or flight limits on the route, or even price setting controls. This can severely reduce the attractiveness of mounting fifth freedom services on these flights.

    US and UK are opened to vaccinated travellers, without quarantine

    With many countries racing to vaccinate their populations, both USA and UK are now accepting vaccinated travellers with only a testing requirement and no need for isolation or quarantine upon arrival.

    What are USA and UK’s current quarantine requirements?
    🇺🇸 United States of America
    The CDC mandates a valid PCR test taken at most 3 days before your flight, and recommends another test 3-5 days after arrival in the US.
    In addition, each state may recommend and enforce their own quarantine requirements. Generally, most states no longer require isolation or quarantine for vaccinated travellers but still encourages unvaccinated travellers to stay home for a number of days upon arrival.
    CNN has a good up-to-date resource here for state requirements here.
    🇬🇧 United Kingdom
    UK classifies all countries into three lists using a ‘traffic light’ system: red, amber and green lists.
    Singapore belongs to the green list, which only requires a pre-departure test taken at most 72 hours before the flight and a mandatory test at most two days upon arrival.
    No quarantine is required for travellers from Singapore.
    USA is on the amber list. All travellers from the US also need to take a pre-departure test and a test upon arrival. Unvaccinated travellers must also quarantine for 10 days and take a third test on the 8th day of arrival, while vaccinated travellers are exempted from both the quarantine and 8th day testing requirements.
    Click here for more details.

    This makes transatlantic leisure and business travel possible again, explaining the growth in flight frequencies and load factors over the past months.

    Out of the four airlines plying the route, all except Delta Airlines have mounted more than one flight a day, in a strong signal that recovery is on its way.

    For instance, BA112 flying from New York JFK to London-Heathrow on 4 Aug has the following indicative seat map for 4 Aug 2021:

    BA112 JFK-LHR, 4 Aug 2021

    The blue seats are occupied, while the white seats are available, reflecting a reasonably high level of load factor even in Economy class. The loads are largely similar for other flights this week as well, resembling passenger loads close to pre-pandemic days.

    Final thoughts

    It is definitely interesting to see what SIA does next, especially as the airline starts bringing back its aircraft from long-term storage.

    Even as Singapore deliberates its border restrictions once it reaches herd immunity level of vaccinations, we may start to see quarantine-free travel restarting, possibly beginning with some European nations. One thing for sure is that this will not be a long list of countries, so its unimaginable that this is the sole reason why SIA is bringing back to A380s at this moment.

    To use the A380s effectively, SIA will be better placed to tap on other markets creatively in order to leverage high-yielding segments, and to get into pole position well ahead of its competitors.

    The next couple of months will definitely see some interesting developments – so let’s see how this unfolds.

  • Commentary: What will happen to Changi Airport?

    Commentary: What will happen to Changi Airport?

    With major carriers at the airport almost zeroing their capacity, what are Changi’s options?

    In the fight against Covid-19, Singapore has finally done in March what it has long been reluctant to do: shutting off its borders to visitors.

    As an international and world renowned air hub, this was simply unimaginable in the past. Here in Singapore, we pride ourselves for being an open nation, where foreign tourists and businesses alike are welcome to spend and earn their money here.

    Since the beginning of the year, Singapore has increasingly tighten the controls to keep the virus out. First it was a Stay-Home Notice (SHN) on visitors from select region, followed by a ban of visitors from certain regions, and the list of countries slowly expanded over the weeks.

    These measures weren’t success enough, by the government’s standards, to keep the virus at bay, so the final gauntlet was dropped on Sunday when Singapore announced it will bar all short term visitors since 23 Mar. Subsequently, even long-term pass holders had to seek permission before setting off for Singapore, and anecdotally there are many instances where these workers are told to hold off their return to Singapore.

    So as countries around the world shut their borders, Singapore had no choice but to do the same.

    Home carriers reduce their capacity drastically

    Since February, all three home-based carriers have been cutting their flights. First it was all flights to China, and as the virus spread across the world, more and more flights were cut.

    In the latest moves, Singapore Airlines, Changi’s home carrier, announced a 96% cut to its originally scheduled April capacity.

    This follows Scoot’s announcement of grounding all but two aircraft, to continue operating only about 1% of its capacity. The low cost carrier will only operate 26 flights between 22 Mar and 5 Apr.

    Jetstar Asia, the smallest of the Singapore-based carriers, has thrown in its hat earlier in the month to say that it will ground all flights for three weeks from 23 Mar through 15 Apr. It probably had the foresight to see this coming, given the timing of its suspension.

    In the first three months of 2020, Changi Airport reported a drop of 32.7% in passenger numbers, with most of the fall coming from February and March. This is likely to continue falling as nations hold out on closed borders.

    Terminals are eerily quiet

    If one takes a look at Changi Airport’s flight information, they are mostly blank.

    Take 23 Mar, Monday, just before the all out ban on short-term visitors kicked in for example. Changi’s Terminal 4 has only seven scheduled flights on the Flight Information Display System (FIDS), and only one is operating – CX759 from Hong Kong. I wonder how many people were on that flight.

    With the drop and virtually no visitors, one might expect that the hardest hit groups will include airside retail operators, ground handlers and other service providers.

    At its peak of handling over 68 million passengers, Changi Airport depends on over 20,000 workers within the airport community to keep the airport running smoothly. Now that we are seeing just drips of passengers, one can imagine that many of these jobs will be at risk.

    So with a dwindling number of flights, what are Changi Airport’s options to minimise the impact to its service providers and tenants?

    Reduced footprint across all terminals

    Up to last night, Changi Airport was still operating flights across all seven piers (A through G) across four terminals. One possibility is to restrict operations to one pier of each terminal, while cordoning off the other.

    The layout of Changi Airport and the seamless connection across Terminals 1 to 3 may work against this option right now, but there can still be a meaningful way to do it.

    For instance, Changi Airport could consider shutting off all the A gates in Terminal 3 and F gates in Terminal 2, while using the B & E gates respectively. Given’s Terminal 1’s seamless connection to Terminals 2 & 3, it may not be feasible to close off any parts of it.

    By shutting off one pier in two of the terminals, Changi could look to park grounded aircraft at the closed off piers, and also close off one set of immigration counters at each terminal. This arrangement will also allow transit retail operators to reduce its footprint, and thereby reducing overheads during this period of time despite the rental relief that Changi has said to offer.

    Consolidate ops in one terminal

    If the low traffic is going to persist for a while, Changi Airport can also consider closing off one terminal, just as what London Heathrow is contemplating.

    If that happens, this will likely happen to Terminal 4, given that it is now operating only 1 to 2 flights a day. Sources familiar with Changi Airport says that while this is being studied, it is very unlikely. This is because there is a possibility that airlines who are asked to move back to Terminals 1 to 3 – despite it being temporary – may not want to move back to Terminal 4 once the situation normalises, as Terminals 1 to 3 enjoys better land transport options and also a wider range of facilities, including the proximity to Jewel Changi Airport.

    A terminal move is also a major undertaking both for airlines and the airport. Typically, airlines moving terminals will have to configure their check-in systems to the rows that they are working out of. Along with that, they may also have to move certain specialised equipment and signages, and sometimes, their office.

    The obvious upside to this option is that as Changi Airport is currently upgrading Terminal 2, this will allow Changi Aiport to shut off Terminal 2 altogether and fast track the upgrading works, making this a fairly attractive proposition given that it is almost certain that traffic numbers will take time to go up again.

    Final thoughts

    While conserving resources to minimise ‘wastage’ is critical during this time, one must not forget that aviation is a very big part of the Singapore’s economy, accounting for about 5% of Singapore’s GDP.

    The airport alone supports about 20,000 jobs, and with this virtual halting of traffic, many of these jobs are definitely at risk. On top of these jobs, there are also the non-aviation businesses, such as the retail outlets within the terminals that are at risk with a prolonged downturn.

    While Changi Airport Group – the airport’s operator – has stepped in to offer rental waivers for its tenants, more can be done to help these businesses stay afloat, especially if the crisis prolongs.

    Changi Airport Group’s consistently draw in an annual operating profit in excess of S$900 million, with net profit varying from year to year depending on other factors. Most of this would come from its non-aeronautical revenue, given that the aeronautical revenue is regulated and therefore can be presumed to not draw much of a profit.

    While the company is a privately held corporatised entity, Changi Airport Group cannot take away from the fact that it is operating a national – if not global – institution. By extension, it has a national service role in keeping jobs and helping businesses stay afloat, especially when it uses the Singapore brand, and leverage many other Singapore brands operating on its premises when selling itself to the world. It has relatively deep reserves, and if there’s a time the reserves should be tapped on, the time is now.